Reflections on a Journey
March 16, 2024
My journey took an unexpected turn at the end of last year when I received a rejection letter for the political science vacancy at the Raad van Advies of Curaçao. This vacancy had been a beacon of hope for me for over a year, and it was not the first time I had applied. The rejection stung, mainly because I believed I had the qualifications and experience to contribute meaningfully to such a board.
Upon receiving the rejection, I couldn't help but feel a surge of negative emotions. However, I chose not to delve into them immediately, perhaps because I was preoccupied with another significant assignment from the Parliament. But as the days passed, I reflected on the rejection's circumstances and what it might signify.
Despite internal support for my appointment, I was blackballed after unofficial consultations with the board of ministers. This revelation was disheartening. It highlighted a disturbing trend of silencing dissenting voices, even in institutions that uphold democratic values.
As a political scientist and public administrator, dissent is ingrained in my professional ethos. Critical thinking and independent analysis are essential tools in our discipline. Yet, these very qualities seem to be increasingly viewed with suspicion if not outright hostility.
The rejection forced me to confront uncomfortable truths about our democracy. It made me question why dissent is often met with resistance and retaliation. Is it because those in power fear losing control? Or perhaps they perceive dissent as a threat to their authority?
Moreover, the composition of the board itself raised concerns. Individuals with questionable track records and dubious qualifications occupy positions of influence, while qualified candidates like myself are sidelined. It's a sobering reminder of the flaws in our democratic institutions.
One particular board member, who had played a role in my dismissal as chancellor in 2011, epitomized the issue. Ironically, someone who had contributed to my professional setback now holds sway over important decisions affecting the community.
In essence, my rejection from the Raad van Advies served as a wake-up call. It revealed the cracks in our democracy and the urgent need for reform. If institutions meant to safeguard democratic principles are compromised, what hope is there for genuine progress?
Moving forward, I am committed to continuing my journey of dissent and advocacy for a more inclusive and transparent democracy. It won't be easy, but it's a battle worth fighting. After all, dissent is not just a right; it's a responsibility—one that I intend to uphold with unwavering determination.
Miguel Goede
Comments