top of page
mpgoede

Deep Democracy: A Path to Inclusive Decision-Making in the Caribbean

Deep Democracy: A Path to Inclusive Decision-Making in the Caribbean


September 26, 2024


During the Governance 5.0 masterclass, Carla Martina introduced the concept of Deep Democracy, a decision-making approach that could be transformative for Caribbean Small Island Developing States (SIDS). But what exactly is Deep Democracy, and how does it work?

Deep Democracy is a vision, method, and theory all rolled into one. At its heart, it’s a practical approach to decision-making that ensures every opinion is heard, acknowledged, and considered. Instead of rushing to consensus, it encourages recognizing and including alternative viewpoints. This process allows for more thoughtful, inclusive decisions, where diversity of thought becomes a strength rather than a point of conflict.

The method is known as the Lewis Method of Deep Democracy, developed by Myrna Lewis in post-apartheid South Africa. The method was born from the necessity to navigate deep societal divisions and move toward unity in business decision-making. Today, teams and organizations using the Lewis Method have found increased effectiveness through inclusivity, co-creation, and sustainable change. The process is built on participatory leadership principles, where courageous collaboration, even in the face of difficult conversations, leads to better outcomes. This method is like the Dutch Polder model, where consensus-building through dialogue and including different societal groups has long been a hallmark of decision-making. Both approaches recognize that long-term, sustainable solutions arise when all voices are considered, no matter how different.

While both Deep Democracy and the Polder model aim to foster inclusive decision-making, Deep Democracy further addresses the emotional and psychological undercurrents of group dynamics. In contrast, the Polder model focuses more on practical negotiation and consensus in specific institutional contexts. They are committed to inclusive, participatory decision-making, but the methods and depth of engagement differ.

In most organizations, decision-making is often ineffective, leading to delays, frustration, and even subtle sabotage. Deep Democracy helps to make underlying tensions and conflicting opinions visible and manageable. Through respectful dialogue and discussion, opposing views are explored and valued, leading to deeper, more thoughtful decisions. This, in turn, drives more significant action and implementation, resulting in lasting change.

Deep Democracy can offer a powerful solution for Caribbean SIDS. This method provides a pathway to more inclusive, collaborative, and effective governance in regions where historical, cultural, and social dynamics can make decision-making complex. By embracing this approach, Caribbean SIDS can tap into the full potential of their diverse communities, just as the Dutch have done with the polder mod-el.

Ultimately, Deep Democracy is not just about making decisions but about fostering more robust, inclusive communities where every voice matters. By recognizing and respecting the value of diversity, we can build a future where decisions reflect the collective wisdom of all, not just the loudest voices.


Miguel Goede

1 view0 comments

Comments


bottom of page