Democracy Without Opposition?; Barbados

Democracy Without Opposition?; Barbados

14 February 2026

The recent election outcome in Barbados is striking. For the third consecutive time, the Barbados Labour Party led by Mia Mottley has won every seat in parliament — a 30–0 clean sweep. Historic, impressive, and unsettling at the same time.

The result reflects the high level of public trust in Mottley’s leadership. In times of economic uncertainty and broader crises, voters increasingly gravitate toward strong leaders or dominant governments that promise stability and decisive action.

Yet a parliament without an opposition raises fundamental democratic concerns. Formally, everything is in order: elections were held and the outcome is clear. Substantively, however, the absence of countervailing power matters. Who scrutinizes decisions? Who holds the government accountable? Who represents dissenting voices?

This tension is not unique to Barbados. Similar patterns appear elsewhere. In El Salvador, President Nayib Bukele combined overwhelming electoral support with the systematic weakening of institutional checks. Singapore has long delivered stability under one-party dominance, but with limited political pluralism. Comparable trajectories can be seen in Venezuela under Chávez and Maduro, in Turkey under Erdoğan, and even in the United States under Trump, where democratically elected leaders have shown increasingly authoritarian tendencies.

The lesson is both old and urgent: power must be distrusted and therefore controlled. Democracy is not only about winning elections; it is about governance — strong institutions, checks and balances, and space for dissent.

The question, then, is not whether Mottley has a mandate. She clearly does. The real question is whether a democracy without effective opposition can remain healthy and sustainable in the long run. Power without counterpower may be efficient, but it is rarely stable.

Miguel Goede